Page through the Bible and the
number of titillating or sordid sex tales are few and far between, but this
week’s parashah, Vayislah, comes about as close as the Bible gets to the
stuff of the National Inquirer. The story
goes that Dina, Jacob’s only daughter, wandered out of the comfy and secure
tents of her father to interact with the ladies in the neighborhood. Shechem, a Hivite prince, ran into her, and
she into him, and he unceremoniously raped her.
But then, at least according to the text, Shechem fell in love with her,
and moved his father to secure her for him in marriage.
To make a long story short, Jacob
was none too happy with this development, his sons less so, and after a
negotiation in which it would appear that Shechem consented to all the
prerequisites for this match to take place, two sons of Jacob, Shimon and Levi,
entered Shechem’s town and murdered all the males.
In recent times, as our awareness
of women’s issues has come into sharp focus, it has been noted that the one
voice absent from this biblical narrative is Dina’s. What was her read on this unanticipated relationship? The text describes the initial encounter as a
rape, but then goes on to describe Shechem’s love of Dina. Rape and love are not a comfortable
pair. What did go on there? Did Dina welcome Shechem’s forward
advances? Was Dina overpowered by a
prince in the neighborhood who overstepped his bounds? Dina is silent. We can only wonder what her impressions were.
The absence of Dina’s perspective
may not be, as some have suggested, the consequence of a male narrator uninterested
in the female point of view. And we can
say this based on recent developments surrounding Bill Cosby, now that some 19
women have come forward to accuse him of a variety of sexual assaults. But wait—when did these alleged encounters
take place? Women have accused Cosby of
incidents that took place some 20, 30 and even 40 years ago. Where were their voices up until now?
The fact is that unwanted sexual
advances are not generated by love but by an opportunity to take advantage of
someone who is either vulnerable or powerless to fend off the assault. It takes a whole lot of courage to admit in
public that one has been abused or taken advantage of. It could be understood as an admission of
failure, a confession of weakness—an unpleasant twist to a painful situation. And there is always the real possibility that
doubts about the story will arise, that someone will cast the accuser as a
liar, and by this add insult to injury. We
can’t say for sure that Cosby is guilty, but we certainly cannot say that the extensive
time lapsed between crime and accusation is proof that the crime never
happened.
I hope Bill Cosby is innocent. He’s brought a lot of laughter into our
lives. But I hope that the accusations
against him are taken seriously, no matter how much time has lapsed between the
alleged assault and the accusation. It
takes a lot of guts to accuse a powerful person, in public, of a crime
committed against oneself. It may take 10 or 20 or 30 years for the abused to
summon the courage to speak. And as for
Dina, she has remained silent for over 3,000 years.
And so we will watch "The Red Tent" this Sunday and Monday and Anita Diamant will fill us in!
ReplyDelete